RESPONSE TO
READING QUESTIONANAIRE
Allen Johnson
Spring, 1996
1. Bibliographical Data:
Beyond Poverty and Affluence: Toward
an Economy of Care by Bob
Goudzwaard and Harry de Lange. Wm. B.
Eerdmans: Grand Rapids, Michigan. 1995.
2. Summary:
Beyond Poverty and Affluence
sounds a clarion trumpet for radical paradigmatic shift from a growth-infused
free market economy to an economy in which the essential needs and quality of
community present and future within a sustainable environmental carrying
capacity are paramount. Authors Bob
Goudzwaard and Harry de Lange argue passionately that poverty, environmental
degradation, unemployment, and debt are now embedded structurally into the
fabric of our present global economic order, a crisis of culture whose roots as
well as hope for renewal lay in the domain of the religious and sociopolitical
(p. 39).
The authors are sobered by this
daunting challenge in the face of powerful vested interests toward paradigmatic
change, yet propose a "Twelve-Step Program for Economic Recovery" in
which oikonomia, "household
stewardship," would be the over-riding economic goal. Such paradigmatic revolution will
"require nothing less than a conversion" (p. 134), a task the Church
should step up to.
3. Comment from a Personal, Critical
Perspective:
To Goudzwaard's and de Lange's
thinking, the "invisible hand" of the free market is a hand that
takes from the poor to give to the rich (p. 74). To bolster this argument they point to statistics that indicate a
yearly net transfer of $50 billion from developing countries to the
industrialized nations (p. 11). Since
the growth-oriented market is stimulated by greed and self-interest, is it therefore
legitimate to expect the Church to oppose the present economic order as
idolatrous and inimical to God? Not! It continues to be an irony that some of the
loudest voices clamoring for biblical fidelity and morality are neoclassical
economists enamored by the magic of the unrestrained market.
Personally I resonate with
Goudzwaard and de Lange. Is not
community with God and therefore derivatively with one another and creation
what our soul longs for? How can one
then pray, "Thy Kingdom come on Earth as it is in Heaven" while
simultaneously shutting out the poor, irreparably destroying the environment,
snubbing the future, and coveting and chasing material largesse?
Beyond Poverty and Affluence
is a vision and prescription of how the economy could practically work in
modest, sustainable, and fulfilling fashion for all. It is well-reasoned, consonant with Christian faith, and
inspiring. But how does one begin, that
is, me back here in obscurity, for I am not an influential economic policy
wonk. Would Goudzwaard and de Lange
have some tips for the "wannabe" pioneer under conviction by The
Spirit for a lifestyle and salting witness toward an economy of care?
4. Two Quotes:
Advocates for an unrestrained free
market posit that a resultant healthy economy "trickles down" to
benefit all. Goudzwaard and de Lange counter
this simplistic notion of
"win-win." "We
must promote the notion that when we simply apply the market mechanism,
invariably the unused productive forces orient themselves to those with the
highest incomes" (P. 74).
Along these lines the authors quote President Nyerere of Tanzania
concerning competitive leverage. "Poverty and underdevelopment in Africa
cannot be seen separately from the wealth and technological 'headstart' present
elsewhere. The existing pattern of the division
of wealth in the world is a legacy which buckles over independent Africa. But it is not Africa's own doing. It is not insignificant that one quarter of
the world's population receives four-fifths of the world's income. Wealth creates more wealth, and poverty
leads to more poverty, as a result of increased investment possibilities and
one's power or powerlessness in relation to others" (p. 15).
Centralized government policy can
effect economic shift. Goudzwaard and
de Lange propose a government bias toward community health and environmental
sustainability. "We must therefore introduce into the entire range of government
economic policies, including its fiscal policies, the principle of social,
environmental, and energy selectivity, so that government can provide a maximum
contribution to the sustainability of society as a whole."
"We
urge levying a higher goods and services tax on capital-intensive and
environmentally damaging products; a lower goods and services tax on
environmentally friendly, labor-intensive products and activities in the
service sector; and a lower goods and services tax on public transit and
repairs to existing products" (pp. 146, 147).