Allen Johnson

Rt. 1, Box 119-B

Dunmore, West Virginia 24934

 

February 21, 1993

Mr. R. Lamar Vest, General Overseer

Mr. Homer G. Rhea, Editor, Evangel

Church of God

1080 Montgomery Avenue

Cleveland, Tennessee 37320-2250

 

Dear People of The Church of God:

 

            This letter involves a question of concern.  I am not affiliated with your denomination, but have high regard for one of your pastors who regularly visits the nursing home where I am employed.  His ministry is genuine, humble, and I believe effective to the elderly there.  At times he drops off copies of Evangel for anyone interested to pick up to read.  At times I have looked through these issues and have sensed within your denomination a dedication and commitment to the gospel, and a desire to integrity of following the scriptures through the leading of The Holy Ghost.

            I was looking at an old issue recently which has rather disturbed me, namely the July 1992 issue announcing your Assembly in New Orleans.

 

            On page 7 an announcement trumpeted Oliver North as a featured speaker at a Laity & Pastors Luncheon.  Oliver North?!!

            Obviously he is a hero to your denomination, because your ad mentioned an autograph session, and the cost of paying $20 per ticket would be accepted, I would think, only by ardent fans.  But why would Oliver North be a hero to The Church of God?  And why should he gain "...the respect of the vast majority of freedom-loving Americans?"

            I am interested in his Christian testimony, especially in that as far as I know he has not repented of the violence and deceit he has clearly engaged in.

            Perhaps The Church of God believes that might makes right.  Or that the ends justifies the means.  Or that terrorism is justified as long as it is directed toward the enemies of ones country.

            On closer inspection, however, a more profound theological concern arises:  In your 14 point Declaration of Faith while Jesus is confessed in Trinitarian doctrine, as intercessor, and as blood Atonement, nowhere is He confessed as Lord, in the sense that his ethical teachings as witnessed in the New Testament scriptures would bear upon the believer.  By this omission I would conclude that the Church of God would not take, say, The Sermon on the Mount seriously as a rule over all aspects of ones life.  Perhaps this is at the root of why your adulation of Oliver North is puzzling to me.

 

            I do notice in your Declaration of Faith article 4 which states that all have sinned and are in need of repentance and forgiveness.  Articles 6 and 7 point to a status and standard of holiness.  But what is the measure of holiness, and how does Oliver North so exemplify this in his Christian testimony and witness?

            I do not presume to know or judge the secret recesses of Oliver North's heart, or anyone else for that matter.  However, there is the task of discernment to fidelity to the gospel, to Jesus Christ.  The conduct and ideology of Oliver North to my mind is in considerable discrepancy to the teachings of Jesus Christ.  Matthew 7:15-27 is instructive and sobering, especially considering the placement of these verses at the close of a long dissertation on ethic.

 

            Therefore I would be interested in your reasoning behind  your endorsement of Oliver North , as well as your theological understanding as to the role of Jesus as Lord.

 

            Thank you for your considerate attention to this letter.  I trust you will give it prayerful and humble deliberation.

 

With Respect,

 

Allen Johnson